Audience engagement link doesn’t work quite right, have a look at that. 4th slide has a great comment re: representation of inner reaction to losing a card game. The ideas and intentions you bring up seem more in-depth than the film displays. (Personally, I found the timeslow on the SECOND-TO-LAST card played to be the source of confusion; it created an anti-climactic effect.)
Technologies is pretty well considered. You could have also discussed how your use of technologies would help you get the effects you describe. For example, you state that you used a tripod to “show the audience the realism in the sequence” etc; alright – how does use of a tripod help accomplish that?
Great thoughts, but needed to be pushed just a little further to be fully justified, and you do that with some observations involving more widely-known uses of technology. (i.e. your comments re: the shoulder-mount shots)
Lighting talks about How You Used It but not the meanings or media messages you were aiming at. Same with Editing. Sound section got more meaningful as you went into your efforts to create tension and mood.
Also, where is the “How Did Your Production Skills Develop” section???
Spelling to adjust- Exaggerated (rather than exhadurated) Would HAVE (rather than Would OF) Lose / Losing (rather than LOOSE / LOOSING)
My name is Keeghan Rice. I am a 17 year old high school student studying AS Media Studies at City Impact School in Auckland, New Zealand. This is my blog designed for various school projects done throughout 2015.
Keeghan –
ReplyDeleteAudience engagement link doesn’t work quite right, have a look at that. 4th slide has a great comment re: representation of inner reaction to losing a card game. The ideas and intentions you bring up seem more in-depth than the film displays. (Personally, I found the timeslow on the SECOND-TO-LAST card played to be the source of confusion; it created an anti-climactic effect.)
Technologies is pretty well considered. You could have also discussed how your use of technologies would help you get the effects you describe. For example, you state that you used a tripod to “show the audience the realism in the sequence” etc; alright – how does use of a tripod help accomplish that?
Great thoughts, but needed to be pushed just a little further to be fully justified, and you do that with some observations involving more widely-known uses of technology. (i.e. your comments re: the shoulder-mount shots)
Lighting talks about How You Used It but not the meanings or media messages you were aiming at. Same with Editing. Sound section got more meaningful as you went into your efforts to create tension and mood.
Also, where is the “How Did Your Production Skills Develop” section???
Spelling to adjust-
Exaggerated (rather than exhadurated)
Would HAVE (rather than Would OF)
Lose / Losing (rather than LOOSE / LOOSING)
OVERALL - 11/20
T. Marcus